On Tue, 24 Oct 2000, James Sutherland wrote: > It doesn't add any wonderful new features, admittedly - I started out just > making sure the pages would validate properly as something. Since simply > lower-casing the tags made them valid XHTML, why not set the doctypes > accordingly? >
That's were I still don't understand. The pages validate fine as HTML 3.2 according to http://validator.w3.org/. If they didn't, I could understand changing them. It's not that I don't appreciate your effort; I just don't undertand the reasoning behind it. Joshua.
