Thanks! I guess we'll wait-n-see ;) -Carlos
Julia Pond wrote: > > Well, that's a good, reasoned response...especially that it solves some if > not all organizational problems (which is really all anyone can hope for). > And, sure, it's good to wait and see. > > As to "look and feel"...well, in that arena there's such a thing as "the > devil you know"--not to denigrate anyone's previous work, but just to say > that though it is a major change, its design will facilitate adaptation > without difficulty. > > Joshua Slive wrote: > > > On Mon, 23 Oct 2000, Julia Pond wrote: > > > > > You did a good job on this. > > > > > > > I agree. I think it is nice. It doesn't solve all the organizational > > problems we have with the docs, but it is better than what we have. It > > would, of course, need significant tweaking in terms of what links are > > where, etc. But, that could be done. > > > > However, I am not going to commit this at the moment. Since this is a > > major change in the "look and feel" of the docs, I think we want to see a > > consensus about it. So far we have three positive votes (including mine > > and the submitters), but I think we should wait a little, and see if any > > ASF people or others want to comment. > > > > Joshua. -- RTFM: Not just an acronym, it's the LAW!
