On Tue, 31 Oct 2000, Brian Behlendorf wrote: > > Looks like commits against the httpd-1.3-docs CVS tree are going to both > the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list and new-httpd@apache.org list. That seems > excessive. Either it should just go to apache-docs, or a new list > apache-docs-cvs. Comments? >
I assume you mean they are currently going to apache-docs and apache-cvs? I don't really see a problem with the current situation. It is good to have the docs cvs commits going to the apache-docs list, so that everyone here sees what is going on. In addition, people who monitor the regular cvs list should also be watching doc commits, since the developers are the ones best able to tell if anything really stupid gets written in the docs. People reading apache-cvs are already used to the high volume, so I doubt it bothers them. The only thing I find irritating is getting copies of every commit that touches a header file copied to apache-docs. However, I don't see any way to avoid this given that we want people in apache-docs to have access to the API docs. Joshua.
