Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >- Two or three columns? On my high-res monitors, the two column display >is nicer, but I can see how it could involve lots of scrolling on >lower-res displays. We can't please everyone, but what is the best >compromise?
I think two columns is fine. My browser is usually about 640 pixels wide, and it works fine there. I would have expected three columns to be worse for small screens, not better. >- Should we change the headers of the other pages to match this page (with >the quick links at the top)> The problem with doing this is, as noted >before, it will involve including HTML 4.0 in docs marked as HTML3.2. I >can change the header very easily because it is an SSI, but the <doctype> >is hardcoded into each file, so it is not easy to change. Hmm. I would have suggested adding the doctype to the standard header but the document title gets in the way. Perhaps we should add another include file for the doctype? Oh, and why isn't the <body> colour scheme in the header? (I guess it makes the HTML nesting a bit dubious.) Tony. -- en oeccget g mtcaa f.a.n.finch v spdlkishrhtewe y [EMAIL PROTECTED] eatp o v eiti i d. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
