On Sat, 18 Nov 2000, Tony Finch wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > >> 1. mpmt_pthread is a really crappy name for a module. > > > >Agreed. It is even worse because it doesn't rely on pthreads > >anymore. Please, if anybody can come up with a better name, we need it. > > I think the important thing is to make the distinction between > mpmt_pthread and dexter clear; a jargon-laden pair of names could be > vpft and fpvt (for fixed/variable process/thread). I would also rename > the perchild mpm to fpvtvu for "... variable user" because to my mind > perchild signifies nothing: what changes per child?
Not that the current names are much better, but vpft and fpft are a bit cryptic. I would prefer some clear naming system for MPMs. Ryan _______________________________________________________________________________ Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] 406 29th St. San Francisco, CA 94131 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
