> From: Rodent of Unusual Size [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, December 29, 2000 5:30 AM > > apache-docs is its own list.
Here we are agreed (about the conversations, that is). They are two seperate discussions (although I archive them together myself.) This isn't to say that either group should be ignorant of the other, but for developers _or_ documentors with limited time the traffic on the lists precludes them from being one list. > httpd-docs-{1.3,2.0}-cvs were alii, pointing to apache-docs and > apache-cvs. This was done to ensure that developers couldn't > choose to be ignorant of what was being written about their code. Even if they can ignore ongoing discussion (how do I contribute, which translation is preferred, etc...) _anything_ that touches Apache should hit the [EMAIL PROTECTED] org list for developers to be aware of. This is goodness. > However, since the docco project is about much more than just > documenting the code, there is no need for the documenters to > see all the code changes. Agreed, rather nice the way you tossed the .h files at them so they can see when the big picture changes, and ignore the details. > I originally wanted to keep the two separate, but the loud > comments on new-httpd (again, ISTR it was largely Marc) > resulted in the above. I'm with Brian; I'm willing to > reconfigure this however the consensus wants it -- but > anyone who wants to change it should first check the archives > to see how and why we arrived at the current situation. Ok ... you can stop giving apache-docs the headers and have one entirely seperate docs-cvs list (a bad thing, IMHO). Or we simply create a docs-cvs alias that recieves httpd-docs-cvs plus the relevant .h file changes from httpd-cvs. These commits also go to [EMAIL PROTECTED] So every coder subscribed to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] is notified of every commit (this happens now). any docco folks that subscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED] are notifed of all pertinant commits (this happens now through -this- list.) coders + docco folks who want to follow the apache-docs list will recieve no commit notifications through this mail list. The last point is the one I care about. Objections or comments from anyone here? This means you would need to subscribe to two lists, one for discussion, and a new list for commits to Apache headers and the docs. But if you wanted to see every change to Apache, don't subscribe to the docs-cvs list, and subscribe to the full list instead, and you would no longer get duplicate notifications. If you are a translator, you would not -have- to get notifications at all. And Cliff (and others), any contributor is welcome to comment on this, I know many of you are new to the project, but I'm sure Ken, Brian and I all would like your opinions, since this forum was created _for_you_! Bill