On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Brian Behlendorf wrote: > On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Yoshiki Hayashi wrote: > > Since the reorganization of CVS repository, httpd-docs-2.0 > > commitlogs are not mailed to apache-docs. > > Since commit messages are now coming from come [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead of > [EMAIL PROTECTED], the anti-spam filters need to be told to accept > that new address by a poster;
No, that is not the problem. He is referring to the fact that the apache-docs list is supposed to get copies of all commits to the documentation, but since the apache-2.0/httpd-2.0 switch-over, this has not been happening. > Your patch is doing two things at once, though: > > a) changing instances of apache-2.0 to httpd-2.0 - the right thing to do, > since I presume that people on the httpd-docs-2.0 CVS commit list want > commits to those dirs so they can track changes worth documenting? > Still, a "cvs watch" might be a better way to accomplish this, or > subscribing to apache-cvs and using procmail, since having specific > modules names inside of log_accum.pl is just Icky. Anyways, patch > implemented & committed, to at least perpetuate the ickyness correctly. > I agree this is icky, but my opinion is that it is very important that all commits to the documentation get copied to the docs list. I think that making every subscriber do a bunch of complicated stuff to make that happen raises the entry barrier too high for a group that was specifically designed for easy access. > b) You added the mapping "'httpd-2.0/docs' => 'httpd-docs-2.0');" - since > this is a new thing, I didn't implement it, unless someone who completely > understands the manipulation that Ken did with the modules file explains > that this is the correct thing to do. And it's yet more Ickyness. And it won't work. It will only catch commits in the httpd-2.0/docs directory. It won't catch commits in the subdirectories, where all the content lies. Does anyone have ideas on how to fix this? Ken? Joshua.
