On 19 Jan 2001, Yoshiki Hayashi wrote: > Chris Pepper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > >James Sutherland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > >IMHO XHTML is not an urgent issue and I don't want to go > > >through huge diffs with only case changes to translate both > > >1.3 and 2.0 docs. > > > > Yoshiki, you may be able to find a tool to do tag case changes > > (BBEdit offers this from a menu command, but xemacs must have > > **some** way to do it...). > > Yes, you can type M-x sgml-normalize. :-) > > But my point is that it will be difficult to view the > differences if you don't have good tools. > > Now you can do: > M-x ediff RET httpd-docs-1.3/htdocs/manual/index.html.en RET > httpd-docs-2.0/manual/index.html > After the XHTML change you must do: > C-x C-f httpd-docs-1.3/htdocs/manual/index.html.en RET > M-x sgml-normalize > C-x C-f httpd-docs-2.0/manual/index.html > M-x ediff-buffers RET index.html.en RET index.html RET > (Hmm... Now this doesn't look like much trouble.) > > How about doing case changes and end tags addition on both > 1.3 and 2.0 docs? It is pretty safe operation, IMO. Then > the only difference in body part will be empty elements > changes.
I was assuming that would be the case anyway - 1.3 isn't dead yet :-) James.
