There seems to be general support for starting from scratch with the 2.0 FAQ, subject to first posting what I plan to keep.
However, I would like to see some opinions on the question raised by Bill on what criteria should be used for including things in the FAQ. Summary (please correct me if I'm not being fair): Option 1: - Include only "Showstopper" FAQs which prevent people from using Apache. I believe this would mean that the FAQ would contain a few of the questions in the current categories C and D and nothing else. New documents could be created for "Background information" (Part A), and other information could be moved to more appropriate places in the docs. Option 2: - Include questions which are "frequently asked" in the newsgroups, bug database, or the [EMAIL PROTECTED] addresses. Include these things in the FAQ only if they cannot be adequately addressed elsewhere, either because they don't fit in any other documents, or they need to be repeated for added emphasis. My personal opinion is that, while "showstoppers" should be given priority, Option 1 is too restrictive. Other opinions? Joshua
