I just trashed the old install.html in httpd-docs-2.0 and replaced it with an html'ized version of INSTALL from the source distribution. This is a major change, but what was there was so innacurate that I figured nobody could object.
I don't really see the point in having complete documentation both in the manual and in the INSTALL file. Instead, I propose that we trash INSTALL and replace it with a very short summary that just references install.html and "configure --help". The other possibility is to make install.html the short summary. However, it seems that it is much easier to do a good set of documentation in HTML then it is in plain ASCII. Any objections or suggestions? Joshua. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
