[whoops, this was meant for the list] On Sat, 23 Jun 2001, Jason Lingohr wrote: > > Alrighty -- so I'm ok to go ahead and add the troff man's to the root of > the tree, as it is with 2.0?
Hmmm.... I don't think so. I think the conclusion from Ken and me is that we shouldn't be moving around the troff versions because this would involve changes in the apache configuration process. Ken and I both agree that there should be html versions in the docs tree, but those are already there. > > Is there any source derivation? Like, are the troff's generated from the > HTML versions, vice versa or what? Any dependancies in this regard I > should know about? > The HTML versions are generated from the troff versions at the moment. I have some (very nasty) C code that does the job. If you want a copy, please let me know. Joshua. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
