On Wed, 4 Jul 2001, Jason Lingohr wrote: > On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 11:11:11AM -0700, Vernon Marshall wrote: > > > Sorry if this has been mentioned before, but I just joined the list. A nice > > DocBook xml backend gives you html/pdf/ps/rtf frontend with little extra > > pain. Any thoughts? > > I played with DocBook a while ago -- it was nice, but it's hard to write > doco when the structures and support files to make it happen change so > darned often -- not to mention complexity in getting all the tools together > to make it happen, and upgrading them. > > Just my opinion, and this was around September through January last year, > and was using the SGML version of DocBook (ie. not XML). >
Yes, I would tend to think that DocBook might just lead us to a whole other set of problems. I think it is pretty clear that we need a better way of generating the docs, but I have no idea what it should be. Joshua. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
