From: "Joshua Slive" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 9:51 PM


> On Tue, 4 Sep 2001, Rich Bowen wrote:
> 
> > I've been using tidy, from the w3c, for a while now, to do
> > pretty-reformatting of HTML documents. One of the things that it does is
> > lower-case HTML tags. I was wondering, in light of comments made a week
> > or two ago, whether it would be worthwhile to do this with files in the
> > docs as I a working with them?
> >
> > The downside is that it will create a diff in which every line in the
> > file changes (in most cases), and I did not want to start submitting
> > enormous diffs, without running this past folks first.
> 
> A similar question just threatened to start a flamewar on [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> ;-)
> 
> My opinion is that it is not a big deal either way.  (It is not like
> source code where you potentially mess up everyone's patches.)  But
> I prefer not to unnecessarily reformat.  The only time I do reformat is
> when the existing format makes the doc very hard to work with.
> 
> In other words, if it makes it significantly easier for you to work
> with, then go ahead and reformat.  But don't reformat just for the
> sake of consistency.  (I don't care about consistency here because
> it is invisible to the end user.)

Bingo.  And the reformatting _must_ be a patch seperate and apart from the
patch to the actual work.

> Of course, others are bound to have other opinions.

Not significantly ;)


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to