On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Rich Bowen wrote:
> I started doing a few docs with tidy to see how it went, and discovered
> that it is disobeying at least one of the edicts regarding HTML in the
> docs. Specifically, it is doing:
>
> <li><a href=
> "core.html#limitrequestfieldsize">LimitRequestFieldsize</a></li>
>
> Rather than
>
> <li><a href="core.html#limitrequestfieldsize"
> >LimitRequestFieldsize</a></li>
>
> Is this actually a big deal? Is there a rationale for this that goes
> beyond someone's personal preference?
On a related note, tidy has an -asxml switch that produces ...
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd";>
Is *this* something that is desirable? Isn't this the eventual goal?
I tested a few docs, and they converted right over without complaining.
--
Rich Bowen - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://geeks.cre8tivegroup.com/ --- Work
http://www.rcbowen.com/ --- Play
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
