On Sun, 16 Sep 2001, Ryan Bloom wrote: > > Yes, it should be MaxClients. I think the name is ridiculously > > inconsistent with its meaning on MPMs other than prefork, but then that > > problem has been discussed ad nauseum and I don't think we've ever come to > > a consensus on what it should really be called. > > It should be MaxClients on all MPMs, but it should be fixed to be the > maximum number of clients that can connect at one time. The problem > is the implementation, not the name IMHO.
I can live with that. All I care is that the name is consistent with the functionality. --Cliff -------------------------------------------------------------- Cliff Woolley [EMAIL PROTECTED] Charlottesville, VA --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
