Details wouod be good! I was just about to tear into it myself. Since you've just invented the wheel, I'll wait on it.
Why use the older stuff? We don't use much of the functionality of the 98 version. I'm also a firm believer in "If it ain't broke, don't fix it!" It wasn't until this release of our web site that we needed anything more. Thanx! -Michael >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/13/03 04:18PM >>> Well it's happened. MS has released a stable version of the frontpage 2002 server extensions that will run as a DSO for Apache 1.3.26 and later and Apache 2.x. I wish I'd have thought of using the API note facility to store the script file name in. I believed that the Apache module API was flexible enough, I just didn't see the solution. Too bad, that would have made me feel smart :). I was able to build the mod_frontpage DSO using Ready to Run's FrontPage 2002 Server Extensions Service Release 1.1 install script on an up-to-date Debian Woody system (has Apache 1.3.26). Everything went great. A couple config tweaks and I was able to publish to a virtual web via frontpage. I can post the details to this list if anyone asks. Seeing posts like Keith Olmstead's Frontpage problems after upgading freebsd kernel, (sorry I don't have an answer for you) and sites advertising 'FrontPage 98 server extensions' it makes me wonder why the older extensions are needed. I'd appreciate a little light shed on the subject of why use 98 or 2000 extensions when there are 2002 extensions. Jacob [EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. I'm on the digest, so I might not respond right away unless you Cc me. _______________________________________________ Apache-FP mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.joshie.com/mailman/listinfo/apache-fp Donations: http://www.amazon.com/paypage/PT5LZITM9L227 _______________________________________________ Apache-FP mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.joshie.com/mailman/listinfo/apache-fp Donations: http://www.amazon.com/paypage/PT5LZITM9L227
