On Monday, July 23, 2012 11:41 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din <[email protected]> wrote:
> Doesn't that make more reasonable to turn Camel In Action track into > Integration and maybe Messaging and Integration track ? IMO Messaging and Integration would be a good proposal for the name of this track. The talk about the Apache Etch middleware (see discussion in this thread: http://s.apache.org/Ibh) would also fit better into the "Messaging and Integration" then the "ApacheEE" track. Who is the responsible chair for this track so that we could start a discussion about this? Thanks, Martin > On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 8:01 PM, Nick Burch <[email protected]> wrote: >>On Mon, 23 Jul 2012, Dejan Bosanac wrote: >> >>> I just proposed a few talks on ActiveMQ under "Camel in Action" >>>track. If those are accepted, I think it'd be better to have a separate >>>"Messaging" >>> track for these and other potentially related talks. >>> >> >> We can broaden tracks out if there's interest - tracks at the moment >> are based on the submissions received from projects, and not all >> projects responded... >> >> If you think it'd be a good thing for the community to broaden it, and >> if the person down to be track chair for the track does to, we can >> make the change. Check with them, check with the communities, and let >> us know if the consensus is to do that! >> >> (Whether you can have a separate track depends on the submissions >> received. The tracks so far are provisional, and will only go ahead if >> they get enough good talks proposed. If you have a great, late idea >> for a track, and it gets enough submissions, we can accept it, but it >> may have to be at the expense of another track that didn't get many >> good submissions to it...) >> >> Nick >> > > > >-- >Thanks >- Mohammad Nour >---- >"Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep moving" >- Albert Einstein
