On Monday, July 6, 2015, Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote:
> Oh .. I didn't think of that. I was just thinking of a logical sequence in > which the topics build up on each other, but I do understand that two talks > in sequence could be a problem ... then I think this order could be similar: > > - (Justin) Introduction to Apache Flex > - (Chris) An introduction to Apache Flex BlazeDS > - (Justin) Unit testing Apache Flex Applications > - (Om) Build mobile apps using Apache Flex (yes, including iOS!) > - (Chris) Building FlexJS applications with Maven > - (Om) Building HTML5/JS apps using FlexJS thanks I will rearrange the track to this sequence. > > I think this would still build up on each other: After an introduction to > the "client-side" there's a small detour to the server-side (blazeds) ... > after that in general how to unit-test your application, then Om would go > deeper into writing a special, but very important type of client ... mobile > client. After that I could explain how you use all the stuff learned by > Maven hereby sattisfying all the "But how do you do that on a CI server" > guys. As a finale Om would talk about what will probably be the future of > Flex with our super-cool FlexJS. > > Think this wouldn't confuse users, it's still a logical chain and no two > talks of the same speaker in sequence. Siunds correct to me too. rgds jan i > > Chris > > ________________________________________ > Von: jan i <j...@apache.org <javascript:;>> > Gesendet: Montag, 6. Juli 2015 00:58 > An: apachecon-discuss@apache.org <javascript:;> > Betreff: Re: Suggested review timeline for apacheCON CORE. > > On 5 July 2015 at 14:45, Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > Öhm ... I thouht we have to look at what tracks survive LFs selection and > > if we can make a track out of that ... > > > > Well in this case I would like to propose the Flex Track and I would also > > propose this order (@Justin: please correct me if you see it differently > > ... it's 39°C here and I desperately need to get to the pool ;-) ): > > > > - Introduction to Apache Flex > > - Unit testing Apache Flex Applications > > - Build mobile apps using Apache Flex (yes, including iOS!) > > - Building HTML5/JS apps using FlexJS > > - Building FlexJS applications with Maven > > - An introduction to Apache Flex BlazeDS > > > while scheduling, I saw that there are only 3 speakers, and you have > ordered the presentations so that > each speaker will give 2 presentations back to back. > > I do not recommend keeping the same speaker for 2 presentations back to > back. But if the projects prefers > I will let the schedule stay. > > rgds > jan i. > > > > > > Runner-Up Talk (If we need some gap filling): > > Flex Automation - Making automated front-end testing easy > > > > ________________________________________ > > Von: jan i <j...@apache.org <javascript:;>> > > Gesendet: Sonntag, 5. Juli 2015 14:30 > > An: jan i > > Cc: apachecon-discuss@apache.org <javascript:;>; Sharan Foga; Pierre > Smits; Christofer > > Dutz; Leif Hedstrom; Justin Mclean; Roman Shaposhnik; Neha Narkhede; > Kostas > > Tzoumas; Nick Dimiduk; Shawn McKinney; OmPrakash Muppirala > > Betreff: Re: Suggested review timeline for apacheCON CORE. > > > > Hi. > > > > > > Just a polite reminder, it is sunday, and I have not received a single > > track ? > > > > We need to move quickly, to that presenters who are rejected have a > chance > > of applying to big data. > > > > rgds > > jan i. > > > > > > On 30 June 2015 at 11:20, jan i <j...@apache.org <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > > > Hi all > > > > > > In just a few hours the CFP for apacheCON CORE will officially close, > > then > > > the second batch > > > of hard work starts. We need to review the talks and put them in a > > > schedule. > > > > > > Our timeline is a little bit critical, because some presentations are > > > submitted for both events, and > > > if rejected in core the should have a chance in big data, and opposite > if > > > accepted they should be > > > rejected in big data. > > > > > > Wednesday July 1, CFP closes officially, and reviews can start. > > > Thursday July 2, I will write to all who have submitted tutorials etc. > > > Friday July 3, CFP will be really closed and final csv pulled of the > > > database > > > Sunday July 5, Review from track builders (as well as order of tracks) > > > should be completed > > > (please mail me directly the order of the > tracks > > > with the titles) > > > Wednesday July 8, first version of schedule should be ready to be > > > discussed with LF > > > Friday July 10, CFP big data closes, > > > Sunday July 12, accept/reject letters to be mailed. > > > > > > I hope most of you who have build tracks, already know the talks, so > > > reviewing will be an easy > > > and fast task. > > > > > > Help with reviewing all the other talks is HIGHLY appreciated. > > > > > > I am full time working on apacheCON the next week, so do not hesitate > to > > > mail me if case of > > > comments or questions. > > > > > > I will also try to be on IRC as much as possible (#apachecon). > > > > > > on behalf of the apacheCON team > > > jan i. > > > > > -- Sent from My iPad, sorry for any misspellings.
