On 29.09.2016, at 10:26, Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: > > - Some talks gave away the speakers name, but most were anonymous. Sometime > the name is important / most of the time it is not. Perhaps best to edit the > occasional name out for the review process? But do you really want to miss > out on say Jim's Apache Way talk because he only put in a one line > description?
In that direction, it would also be good to consider allowing/requiring reviewers to state a "conflict of interest" on individual submissions. Cheers, -- Richard
