If we want to use jQuery for our tools .. The total size of the DOM
will increase because both mootools(In iframe) and jquery in <head> is
cAlled. Am i right?

So why not make your own cross-browser Framework without using any
other's framework?

On 12-Jan-2011, at 3:53 PM, Anthony Catel <[email protected]> wrote:

> The main idea behind the new pattern is simple :
>
> - Provides a global "APE" object with few method (connect(), disconnect(), 
> ...) and few events APE.onConnect(), onJoin(), ....
>
> - Do what you want with this object with the framework of your choice.
>
>
> Le 12/01/2011 11:48, Anthony Catel a écrit :
>> And BTW, you can use the framework of your choice (even on 1.0 release).
>>
>>
>> Le 12/01/2011 11:46, Anthony Catel a écrit :
>>> No, not JQuery !
>>>
>>> Vanilla Javascript, for a little small framework.
>>> JQuery is not a framework for what we want. JQuery is a DOM ToolKit.
>>>
>>> We just want to avoid MooTools to avoid useless overhead.
>>>
>>> Le 12/01/2011 11:34, Alex McAuley a écrit :
>>>> Thank god for that - Mootools is such an overkill and not very friendly - 
>>>> jQuery would be the much better choice.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Alex Mcauley
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Saif Rehman" <[email protected]>
>>>> To: <[email protected]>
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2011 10:28 AM
>>>> Subject: Re: [APE Project] Re: APE v2 - Proposals and wiki
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> What will be used then? jQuery?
>>>> I might start working on my own Framework on jQuery. I'll share it
>>>> when it's complete.
>>>>
>>>> On 12-Jan-2011, at 2:48 PM, Trani Nicolas <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi marco,
>>>>>
>>>>> we discuss a lot about that, and i think the next version of APE JSF will 
>>>>> not use mootools, and we will do something similar that socket.io do :)
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 12/01/2011 00:23, Marco wrote:
>>>>>> Hi to all,
>>>>>> i used ape-server for a lot of time; the problem is the dependences
>>>>>> with mootools. Ok, you can use other libreries, but the client have
>>>>>> always to load also that.
>>>>>> I think that mootools is good and i don't like jquery, but i think
>>>>>> that anyone has to can choose. Personally i love prototype.
>>>>>> I understand that for you is a lot of work, but i think that you can
>>>>>> work at a little layer of compatibility for the most used js-library.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Another suggestion:
>>>>>> http://cdn.socket.io/stable/socket.io.js
>>>>>> :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 11 Gen, 18:48, stéphane Herraiz<[email protected]>  wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It is possible to have C client API?
>>>>>>> I have made one for v1. It is working well but it is very simple and
>>>>>>> use the obsolete Gnet library...
>>>>>>> On 10 jan, 07:59, Anthony Catel<[email protected]>  wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> As some of you know, we've been working on a new version of APE (server
>>>>>>>> and client) from scratch.
>>>>>>>> (Server :https://github.com/paraboul/APE-Server-v2)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The server code-base is almost finished and we are now ready to
>>>>>>>> implement the new APIs.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> By APIs I mean :
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> - A new "RPC" protocol
>>>>>>>> - A new server C API
>>>>>>>> - A new server Javascript API
>>>>>>>> - And a new client API.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So, it's now time to work together :) The wiki is open :
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -http://www.ape-project.org/wiki/index.php/Category:V2
>>>>>>>> -http://www.ape-project.org/wiki/index.php/Ideas
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Feel free to share your thoughts/ideas.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Btw a new points :
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> - The new server is able to stream static content (and I have some 
>>>>>>>> ideas
>>>>>>>> about serving dynamic content through server-side JS).
>>>>>>>> - "AJAX Push Engine" is renamed to "Async Push Engine"
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Anthony C.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> Groups "APE Project" group.
>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/ape-project?hl=en
>>>>> ---
>>>>> APE Project (Ajax Push Engine)
>>>>> Official website : http://www.ape-project.org/
>>>>> Git Hub : http://github.com/APE-Project/
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "APE Project" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/ape-project?hl=en
> ---
> APE Project (Ajax Push Engine)
> Official website : http://www.ape-project.org/
> Git Hub : http://github.com/APE-Project/

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "APE Project" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/ape-project?hl=en
---
APE Project (Ajax Push Engine)
Official website : http://www.ape-project.org/
Git Hub : http://github.com/APE-Project/

Reply via email to