2010/4/23 Francis Tyers <[email protected]> > El dv 23 de 04 de 2010 a les 16:24 +0200, en/na Kevin Brubeck Unhammer > va escriure: > > Hi, > > > > I thought I should mention this bug (or, these bugs?) > > > > http://bugs.apertium.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104 > > > > on the mailing list since it can introduce a hang in lt-proc. > > > > > > I came across it while messing around with an XSLT to remove certain > > <e>'s from pardefs. > > > > The first issue reported there is odd but not critical; you can get > > spurious analyses if you have a pardef calling two pardefs, where the > > last one has only a single, empty <e>. > > > > The second issue, however, can lead to hangs. Neither lt-proc nor > > lt-comp nor validation reports anything here (so watch out if you have > > empty elements like this). > > > > It's worth noting that this happens with both lttoolbox and > lttoolbox-java. >
Of course. The Java version is 100% compatible. BTW Jim and I found out that just adding a flag (-client) speeds up the Java version considerably. Its now generally twice as slow as the C++ version. Should I have a look or will Sergio do it? Jacob > Fran > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Apertium-stuff mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff > -- Jacob Nordfalk एस्पेरान्तो के हो? http://www.esperanto.org.np/. Memoraĵoj de KEF -. http://kef.saluton.dk/memorajoj/
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Apertium-stuff mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
