2010/10/29 Keld Jørn Simonsen <[email protected]>: > On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 10:57:23PM +0100, Jimmy O'Regan wrote: >> 2010/10/29 Keld Jørn Simonsen <[email protected]>: >> > Hi >> > >> > I am not sure of the status of a way to disabling homonyms >> > introduced by new entries in a monodix. An example is that I have >> > about 40000 lemmas in the swedish monodix, and I would like not >> > to intrude on already existing rules. I would only intrude >> > the old lemmas with a new homonym, all other words should not >> > make problems for existing correct translations. >> > >> > What is the best way to achieve this? >> >> Without retraining the tagger, there's no way to do that. There are >> preference rules, but those only filter on tags. I think it might be >> useful to extend the tagger to have a mechanism to make certain tag >> choices for specific lemmas, and not too difficult to implement, based >> on the existing preference rules, but it's not going to be done in a >> hurry. > > I don't want to exclude the new offending complete lemma, but only > those surface forms of the new lemma, that gives homonyms of > the old existing lemmas. This would address a concern of Jacob's > about introoducing new erroneous surface forms - om my 40.000 swedish > lemmas.
Yes, yes, I understood what you meant. -- <Leftmost> jimregan, that's because deep inside you, you are evil. <Leftmost> Also not-so-deep inside you. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Nokia and AT&T present the 2010 Calling All Innovators-North America contest Create new apps & games for the Nokia N8 for consumers in U.S. and Canada $10 million total in prizes - $4M cash, 500 devices, nearly $6M in marketing Develop with Nokia Qt SDK, Web Runtime, or Java and Publish to Ovi Store http://p.sf.net/sfu/nokia-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Apertium-stuff mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
