On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 08:10:09PM +0200, Trond Trosterud wrote:
>
> Den 5.7.2011 kl. 17.09 skrev Keld Jørn Simonsen:
> (...)
> >>>> complicated. There are a handful of people on this list who use CG,
> >>>> maybe you should talk to one of them. It might do what you want.
> >>> OK, who are you thinking of?
> >> Francis usually relentlessly promotes it. I'm surprised he hasn't
> >> chimed in by now.
>
> I was a bit put off by the naming "disabling new homonyms", but I had already
> started to suspect that this actually meant "disambiguating" or "discarding
> unwanted readings".
>
> Yes, Constraint grammar fits the bill.
How can I disable new homonyms with that?
I could think of something on top of CG - namely if you stil have
ambigity, then an attribute "new" could discard the newer homonyms.
> Newer versions of it actually not only discards contextually improper
> readings ("walk" is Inf in "I want to X", V Prs in "We X fast" and N in "We
> went for a X"), it also add syntactic functions, dependency relations and
> even changes such relations. It is good for contextually determined lexical
> disambiguation (river vs. finance bank etc.). And the compiler is Danish,
> open source, and reasonably well documented.
>
> A good illustration of how CG can contribute to MT (apart from Apertium's own
> achievements) is
>
> http://www.mt-archive.info/MTS-2007-Bick.pdf
Thanks for the input.
best regards
keld
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
_______________________________________________
Apertium-stuff mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
