El dl 26 de 03 de 2012 a les 23:22 +0100, en/na Jimmy O'Regan va escriure: > On 26 March 2012 22:54, Francis Tyers <[email protected]> wrote: > > El dl 26 de 03 de 2012 a les 22:57 +0100, en/na Jimmy O'Regan va > > escriure: > >> On 26 March 2012 22:17, Aaron Rubin <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > Week 10: Checking for an untagged chunk (ex., in the rule "HACE NUM NOM" > >> > in > >> > apertium-en-es.en-es.t1x, forgetting to give the resulting chunk the tag > >> > "adverb," which seems like a conceivable mistake to me). Checking for > >> > incorrect number of arguments in calls to macro. > >> > >> Also already caught by the validator. > > > > Is it ? I've been hit by this before. > > You probably copied a non-chunking rule to a chunker file. A check for > that would be more useful than checking for chunks without tags.
No, the "checking for incorrect number of arguments in calls to macros", not the chunking thing. IIRC that is not caught by the validator. Fran ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF email is sponsosred by: Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure _______________________________________________ Apertium-stuff mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
