Hi,
why not simply trim the dictionaries on compilation? The complier could
just skip all entries that are not present in the bidix, couldn't it?

What's important is that the binary dictionaries, i.e. the transducers,
are consistent, isn't it?

The XML-dictionaries could be untrimmed, that is larger for one language
than the other or containing more than the translated words on both
sides. Words could be added in one dictionary at one time and in the
other some other time. When new translations are introduced in the bidix
the words might already be present in one or both monodixies.

One advantage is that the development could more easily be distributed
among several contributors. They only have to know ONE of the languages
in the pair to contribute! And further, it's far easier to add a
translation in the bidix than choosing the right paradigm for a foreign
word.

Wouldn't such a procedure make the development of a language pair much
simpler?

Yours,
Per Tunedal

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_jan
_______________________________________________
Apertium-stuff mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff

Reply via email to