"Jimmy O'Regan" <[email protected]> writes: > On 9 April 2013 17:32, Xavi Ivars > <[email protected]> wrote: >> 2013/4/9 Jimmy O'Regan <[email protected]> >>> >>> >>> I think something went wrong between these two stages, as Jonathan at >>> least was unaware that the election was taking place -- voter turnout >>> was much lower this time around than last, perhaps something went >>> amiss during the census? And if so, wouldn't it be appropriate to >>> re-open it? >>> >> >> I wouldn't say it was much lower. It has decreased, but I don't think the >> number is so low that we could think something strange happened (28 >> registered voters in 2011 [1] and 22 in this year [2]). > > Aha. Sorry, I somehow had the impression that the number was much > higher last time. > > In any case, as Mikel has pointed out on IRC, the decision is the > election board's.
It didn't occur to me that we have committers who don't follow apertium-stuff, guess I was wrong :) Jernej agreed to keeping the census open a bit more, I do too – Xavi? Should we say until the 16th? So sf.net considers it spam to send messages to all committers, but is there any other place than IRC we should be spamming^Wmessaging? -- Kevin Brubeck Unhammer GPG: 0x766AC60C ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Precog is a next-generation analytics platform capable of advanced analytics on semi-structured data. The platform includes APIs for building apps and a phenomenal toolset for data science. Developers can use our toolset for easy data analysis & visualization. Get a free account! http://www2.precog.com/precogplatform/slashdotnewsletter _______________________________________________ Apertium-stuff mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
