On 19 July 2013 21:03, Francis Tyers <[email protected]> wrote: > El dv 19 de 07 de 2013 a les 19:52 +0100, en/na Jimmy O'Regan va > escriure: >> Er... why? 'lt-comp lr' and 'lt-comp rl' are presumably irrelevant, so >> why not make it 'lt-comp att' or whatever else makes sense. > > The lr/rl is still relevant for compiling a generator or an analyser...
How relevant? Correct me if I'm wrong, but my understanding is that both analyser and generator will need to be exported separately, but converted with the same process. If that's the case, it's not relevant in any real sense. Making a pair of dummy cli wrappers around the same converter doesn't save any documentation because you'll already have to mention the conversion. -- <Sefam> Are any of the mentors around? <jimregan> yes, they're the ones trolling you ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds. Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Apertium-stuff mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
