On 18 Aug 2014 11:06:39 Mikel L. Forcada wrote: > I have removed the copy in my temporary website. It was placed there > but I was not aware that Google was crawling that directory (I thought > it was not).
The "official" link is indeed behind a paywall for me too. But doesn't even Springer allow authors to have preprints of their own papers on their own websites? That is, if you replace the published version by the final draft, won't that square the circle? ( If Springer doesn't allow even this, then I think a more important question of principle is why an open-source MT system is publishing an overview paper in such a journal.) > Also, it looks like Jim is going ahead and publicly taking important > decisions on behalf of the PMC without asking the PMC, or not even the > president of the PMC, who, by the way, it is supposed to be me. I'd be surprised if it were Jim's intention to seek to replace either the PMC or its very effective President! He is "picky" on licensing, which is a good thing, and he was, I think, trying to avoid having the Apertium well poisoned, even inadvertently, which is also a good thing. Perhaps writing a protocol for future issues of this kind would be better than having an election? -- Pob hwyl / Best wishes Kevin Donnelly kevindonnelly.org.uk cymraeg.org.uk ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Apertium-stuff mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
