John Ortega <[email protected]> writes: > I think that's a good argument. And, it makes all the sense in the > world to have them separate. > However, it seems like you could put a "super" make file at the parent > level of all "child" nodes that calls all of the scripts or makes > files, no? > Seems like it would make the package easier to use from a user's > standpoint of view. > That way you are not foregoing lttoolbox or anything else for that > matter. > If you want, I can provide a make file set up that does this.
A makefile to install from SVN would probably be nice to have, it could even check it out from SVN as well :-) Though with "apt-get install apertium" now giving the latest checkouts, it's probably not that pressing any more. -- Kevin Brubeck Unhammer GPG: 0x766AC60C
pgpJHqszHJnxT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Want excitement? Manually upgrade your production database. When you want reliability, choose Perforce. Perforce version control. Predictably reliable. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________ Apertium-stuff mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
