Running our own repository would mean losing some other advantages from SF....
Anyway, such a decision should be run through the project management committee,
after a formal proposal.
Mikel
On 28 July 2015 22:26:01 CEST, Francis Tyers <[email protected]> wrote:
>A 2015-07-28 22:15, Flammie Pirinen escrigué:
>> FWIW, I've taken the opportunity to finally migrate apertium-fin[1]
>and
>> apertium-fin-eng[2] to github, I expect to move rest of fin-* as I
>> touch
>> them the next time. As those who follow IRC may know, this is not
>only
>> a response to the downtime but also continued controversies[3]
>> involving
>> sourceforge, which I do not really want to associate any of my
>projects
>> and name with, and constant slowness, bugginess and unresponsiveness
>of
>> their SVN and other systems.
>>
>
>Sounds reasonable, probably a good idea to remove them from the SVN
>after
>you migrate them. But leave the ones you haven't worked on, e.g.
>fin-est,
>fin-sme, fin-udm, fin-myv, eus-fin, etc.
>
>We should perhaps consider running our own SVN repository, seeing as
>Tino
>already has a mirror.
>
>F.
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>_______________________________________________
>Apertium-stuff mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Apertium-stuff mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
