Tino Didriksen <[email protected]> čálii: > On 4 January 2016 at 04:08, Anthony J. Bentley > <[email protected]> wrote: > > In this release I notice there's a typo in the configure script, > which causes lttoolbox not to be detected on OpenBSD: > > checking for APERTIUM... yes > checking for LTTOOLBOX... no > configure: error: Package requirements (lttoolbox >= > required_lttolbox_version) were not met: > > Fixed in svn r64374. I wonder why this doesn't break the build on > Debian Sid. > > You should use svn exports pegged to a revision as basis for > packaging, if you can. The tarballs are for systems where svn is not > possible. We use svn revision pegging for all packaging, because it > avoids stale autotools outputs.
Though from the dev side, making and testing tarballs does turn up some of our packaging bugs. The right revisions should be copied to https://svn.code.sf.net/p/apertium/svn/tags/ btw, but a lot of the older releases are missing there. -Kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Apertium-stuff mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
