We have these 3 tasks about adding features to lttoolbox:
-
http://wiki.apertium.org/wiki/Ideas_for_Google_Summer_of_Code#Robust_tokenisation_in_lttoolbox
-
http://wiki.apertium.org/wiki/Ideas_for_Google_Summer_of_Code#Extend_lttoolbox_to_have_the_power_of_HFST
-
http://wiki.apertium.org/wiki/Ideas_for_Google_Summer_of_Code#Add_weights_to_lttoolbox
Why don't we instead add .dix format support to HFST, add weights to that
format, drop lttoolbox, and just use HFST wholesale? It can do all the
things we want - just need dix support.
That sounds like a fraction of the work and we don't duplicate code.
-- Tino Didriksen
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Apertium-stuff mailing list
Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
