2018-02-16 9:13 GMT+03:00 Francis Tyers <fty...@prompsit.com>:

> El 2018-02-14 01:38, Shardul Chiplunkar escribió:
>> Thanks for your comments.
>> Felipe, I have tried to respond to your comment on the proposal page.
>> Please let us know if you have further questions.
>> It seems that making the repository read-only and later deleting it is
>> the best option then. As Fran and Xavi said, we would go through the
>> wiki pages, READMEs, Virtualbox/Docker configs, etc. to replace
>> SourceForge links with GitHub links in the meantime.
>> Shardul C.
> Note, this will not just be replacing links, but also commands. It's no
> good
> replacing a link "svn co http://"; with the github one, and then leave a
> "svn commit". The documentation should be updated wholesale as a result of
> the move.
> This includes rewriting the contents of the Using_SVN page and deprecating
> it.

Yes, indeed. As a simple user of svn, and knowing nothing about git, I'll
be glad to have a "git for dummies" similar to the  Using_SVN page, so that
I'll be able to continue the work with my usual language pairs.

Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
Apertium-stuff mailing list

Reply via email to