2018-02-16 9:13 GMT+03:00 Francis Tyers <fty...@prompsit.com>:

> El 2018-02-14 01:38, Shardul Chiplunkar escribió:
>
>> Thanks for your comments.
>>
>> Felipe, I have tried to respond to your comment on the proposal page.
>> Please let us know if you have further questions.
>>
>> It seems that making the repository read-only and later deleting it is
>> the best option then. As Fran and Xavi said, we would go through the
>> wiki pages, READMEs, Virtualbox/Docker configs, etc. to replace
>> SourceForge links with GitHub links in the meantime.
>>
>> Shardul C.
>>
>
> Note, this will not just be replacing links, but also commands. It's no
> good
> replacing a link "svn co http://"; with the github one, and then leave a
> "svn commit". The documentation should be updated wholesale as a result of
> the move.
>
> This includes rewriting the contents of the Using_SVN page and deprecating
> it.


Yes, indeed. As a simple user of svn, and knowing nothing about git, I'll
be glad to have a "git for dummies" similar to the  Using_SVN page, so that
I'll be able to continue the work with my usual language pairs.

Hèctor
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Apertium-stuff mailing list
Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff

Reply via email to