Hi,

For 1.11, may I ask the reason why the existing code was not merged?

Yu-Jung

On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 8:22 AM ashwath s via Apertium-stuff <
apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:

> hi im interested in 1.12 ud and apertium integration. How do i get started
> ?
>
> On Fri, 15 Feb, 2019, 17:34 Priyank Modi, <priyankmod...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>> I am really interested in working on 1.2(for hin-pan(Hindi-Punjabi)) if
>> it's open. Could you please connect me to the POC for the language pair. If
>> that's not available, could I work on 1.15? I want to get started right
>> away, I have already gone through the wiki pages for both and just want to
>> get connected to the mentor and access to the repository (for hin-pan, as
>> the latest commit had a bug, I need to revert back to check the functioning)
>>
>> On Mon 28 Jan, 2019, 10:43 PM Francis Tyers <fty...@prompsit.com wrote:
>>
>>> Here is my run-down on the current GSOC ideas page:
>>>
>>>      1.1 Anaphora resolution for machine translation
>>>
>>> Nice project idea, but not sure in 3 months.
>>>
>>>      1.2 Bring a released language pair up to state-of-the-art quality
>>>
>>> Always needed
>>>
>>>      1.3 Robust tokenisation in lttoolbox
>>>
>>> Up for grabs, we need this
>>>
>>>      1.4 Adopt an unreleased language pair
>>>
>>> Always needed
>>>
>>>      1.5 Extend lttoolbox to have the power of HFST
>>>
>>> I think getting this one is unlikely and requires more than 3 months.
>>>
>>>      1.6 Robust recursive transfer
>>>
>>> Keep, this would be really great. I got asked to run a workshop on
>>> Apertium
>>>   recently and then unasked when they found out that the formalisms
>>> didn't
>>> actually create parse trees :)
>>>
>>>      1.7 Extend weighted transfer rules
>>>
>>> There is ongoing work in this, it would need to be supervised carefully:
>>>
>>> https://github.com/sevilaybayatli/apertium-ambiguous
>>>
>>> I would say a nice project would be to really use this on a new language
>>> pair
>>>
>>>      1.8 Improvements to the Apertium website
>>>
>>> Not sure
>>>
>>>      1.9 User-friendly lexical selection training
>>>
>>> I think getting this one is unlikely and requires more than 3 months.
>>> Also has
>>> been tried several times without luck.
>>>
>>>      1.10 Light alternative format for all XML files in an Apertium
>>> language pair
>>>
>>> I'm not sure about this one.
>>>
>>>      1.11 Bilingual dictionary enrichment via graph completion
>>>
>>> There is code for this, it was a GSOC project last year but wasn't
>>> merged, I'm
>>> not sure how well it works.
>>>
>>>      1.12 UD and Apertium integration
>>>
>>> This is a very useful project. If we can take advantage of UD corpora we
>>> can
>>> make supervised taggers for around 70% of our languages.
>>>
>>>      1.13 Add weights to lttoolbox
>>>
>>> This was done last year. A nice project would be to actually make use of
>>> it.
>>>
>>>      1.14 Improving language pairs mining Mediawiki Content Translation
>>> postedits
>>>      1.15 Unsupervised weighting of automata
>>>
>>> Open
>>>
>>>      1.16 Improvements to UD Annotatrix
>>>
>>> This is a really useful tool.
>>>
>>>      1.17 apertium-separable language-pair integration
>>>
>>> Agree, but I think that it should not just be apertium-separable, but
>>> perhaps
>>> something like "upgrade a language pair to use all the latest apertium
>>> tricks"
>>>
>>>      1.18 Create FST-based module for disambiguating
>>>
>>> I like this idea, but I'm not sure three months is enough time, without
>>> someone
>>> who really knows what they are doing with both the FST library and
>>> apertium.
>>>
>>>      1.19 Python API/library for Apertium
>>>
>>> This was mostly done right? I think this is still a really important
>>> project
>>>
>>>      1.20 TIPP functionality for Apertium
>>>
>>> Not sure
>>>
>>> There is a lot of functionality that is not used widely that could be
>>> really
>>> used to improve performance of language pairs.
>>>
>>> * apertium-separable
>>> * weights in lttoolbox
>>> * weighted transfer
>>>
>>> Fran
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Apertium-stuff mailing list
>>> Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Apertium-stuff mailing list
>> Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Apertium-stuff mailing list
> Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
>
_______________________________________________
Apertium-stuff mailing list
Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff

Reply via email to