Daniel Swanson <awesomeevildu...@gmail.com> čálii: > With regards to metalrx features, wouldn't it be better (and in some ways > easier) to incorporate them directly into lrx-comp? > > I just opened a PR for adding <repeat>: > https://github.com/apertium/apertium-lex-tools/pull/32. <def-seq> and > <def-macro> would be a bit trickier, but should still be fairly doable.
👍 I'd definitely prefer that – my metalrx.xslt was never meant as anything but a stopgap until Someone fixed it in C++, thanks =D
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Apertium-stuff mailing list Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
