El 2019-10-13 11:27, Tino Didriksen escribió:
https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/python-policy/ch-module_packages.html#s-package_names
The package python3-apertium must provide the Python module apertium,
but it provides apertium_core. I can fix this by either adding an
alias apertium.py with 'from apertium_core import *' or by renaming
the package to python3-apertium_core.
I would want source package apertium to own python3-apertium and
module apertium. That just looks nicer and follows logically. But
that's in conflict with apertium-python also wanting to own Python
module name apertium.
The name "apertium" is just too overloaded, and now it's starting to
be an issue.
What solution are people in favour of?
(same issue with python3-cg3 module constraint_grammar, and
python3-hfst module libhfst)
I like the former, could we do something like:
import apertium_core as apertium
?
Fran
_______________________________________________
Apertium-stuff mailing list
Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
