Absolutely - everyone should double-check my work, but especially the election committee.
Problem is that not everyone has access to https://github.com/orgs/apertium/outside-collaborators - only org admins do. So I went through that, and in the process merged other sources anyway. The few I did not include in the spreadsheet from https://github.com/orgs/apertium/outside-collaborators are the ones who exclusively have access to https://github.com/apertium/courses-esudh - they're in authors.json section 20 with prefix _COURSE_ - but they don't have available emails or names anyway. -- Tino Didriksen On Fri, 6 Mar 2020 at 16:50, Jonathan Washington < jonathan.n.washing...@gmail.com> wrote: > And since > - Tino's running for president, and > - taking a census like this is technically the election committee's > responsibility (I believe), > > The election committee should probably verify Tino's work. > > -- > Jonathan > > пт, 6 мар. 2020 г. в 07:05, Tino Didriksen <m...@tinodidriksen.com>: > >> Combined list of everyone I can find that currently are on any of our >> lists and thus may be eligible to vote: >> >> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ECL_8Lkfx4A66xpHhbOTn7ljKoDcLa0w7MdFZC7DOpA >> >> Includes outside-collaborators and .mailmap. Comes out to 310 names, of >> which 308 have emails. >> >> I have also merged everything into >> https://github.com/apertium/apertium-packaging/blob/master/authors.json >> >> -- Tino Didriksen >> >
_______________________________________________ Apertium-stuff mailing list Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
