That's not a good reason to choose something. As you yourself were noting about our use of certain frameworks in html-tools, popularity isn't a good criterion.
The way this should work is the proposer (potentially with other interested parties) does a thorough review of the options and opens up discussion in the community based on those options. Proposing one option with no reasoning (except that it "seems fairly popular") or context is unlikely to win anyone over. -- Jonathan 9 apr 2020, C.a. tarixində 13:47 tarixində Samuel Sloniker <scoopgra...@gmail.com> yazdı: > > No particular reason, it just seems fairly popular. > > On Thu, Apr 9, 2020, 10:45 Jonathan Washington > <jonathan.n.washing...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Why Material and not some other standard? >> >> -- >> Jonathan >> >> 8 apr 2020, Ç. tarixində 16:02 tarixində Samuel Sloniker >> <scoopgra...@gmail.com> yazdı: >> > >> > (for the next PMC) >> > http://wiki.apertium.org/wiki/PMC_proposals/Use_Material_Design >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Apertium-stuff mailing list >> > Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net >> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Apertium-stuff mailing list >> Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff > > _______________________________________________ > Apertium-stuff mailing list > Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff _______________________________________________ Apertium-stuff mailing list Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
