This is awesome. Thank you for setting it up, Xavi! I set up some Docker Hub based automation when I first created the repository but I'm not surprised that it's bitrotten. It was never particularly stable. I suspect GH Actions will be far superior.
A great extension here would be to set up automatic publishing to PyPi when apertium-apy has a new version pushed. Looks like there's a guide <https://packaging.python.org/en/latest/guides/publishing-package-distribution-releases-using-github-actions-ci-cd-workflows/>. I might give it a shot this weekend if I have a chance. On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 5:30 AM Xavi Ivars <xavi.iv...@gmail.com> wrote: > While looking back at this, I realized it's been more than 7 months that > we haven't published any image to DockerHub, to the point that using > apertium/apy:latest as a base image may not work in some cases (due to > using a quite old debian version, being oldstable instead of stable now). > > For now, I've added another Github Action that will build and push to the > GitHub Container Registry, and I'll do the same to push "apertium/base". > > I'll wait for Sushain's answer to also push those images to Docker Hub > > > > Missatge de Xavi Ivars <xavi.iv...@gmail.com> del dia dj., 9 de des. 2021 > a les 23:02: > >> Hi all, >> >> I've been doing a bit of cleanup on apertium-apy, and realized that >> Travis hasn't been working for a while. >> >> To solve for it, I did an initial integration with GithubActions. >> >> I haven't spend too much time on it (Tino mentioned on IRC he's working >> on a better CI for all modules) but I didn't want to allow merges with >> tests failing. >> >> I'd love if those of you who have more expertise on Apy could take a look >> at this: >> >> https://github.com/apertium/apertium-apy/pull/184 >> >> Other things I've seen not properly working on that repo: >> - Pushes to dockerhub >> - Pushes to Pypi? >> - Not sure if with my changes I broke the code coverage check >> >> If there are no objections, I'll probably merge it in the next couple of >> days. Even if this is just an starting point, it should be already better >> than what we had (no checks running at all) >> -- >> < Xavi Ivars > >> < http://xavi.ivars.me > >> > > > -- > < Xavi Ivars > > < http://xavi.ivars.me > >
_______________________________________________ Apertium-stuff mailing list Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
