WE NEED TO MONITOR AND PUBLICISE THIS. << Messages that don't get thru to their destination >> << Yup, that is happening to all of us >>
Perhaps someone could start a mailing/discussion group. Title something like: 'EMAIL STEALTH CENSORSHIP'. There would be a an outcry and big awakening if the whole Internet was censored. But a stealth censorship of all main threats to the NWO makes sense, doesn't it. That way there is no huge general public outcry. If a lot of publicity could be done on this, those censoring may back off, and/or we may find ways to get around what they are doing. The 'Stop Chemtrails' section of my website is the most visited section. I used to get very frequent enquiries and reports from people regarding the Chemtrail spraying atrocity, but for the past nine months I have had approximately zero new mail regarding Chemtrails. I keep sensing my email is being extensively manipulated. If we publicise on this issue, it would help alert new activists, so that they could recognise the first signs of it happening to them. If we all fight back - fighting back can make a difference. << it cuts out sometimes when they are working on things because its not consistant or have a pattern... >> Seems like the time to start fighting back is ..... NOW. If you don't receive this, please let me know. Michael Irving On Mar 22, 3:26 am, "Sweat Sue" <[email protected]> wrote: > Yup, that is happening to all of us, I thing they are hooking us up to being > fully monitored and it cuts out sometimes when they are working on things > because its not consistant or have a pattern.... > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] ; [email protected] ; > [email protected] ; [email protected] ; > [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] > Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2009 7:23 PM > Subject: [APFN] Proof that liberty defending email is being censored > > I too have seen some strange things on the Interent lately. Messages that > don't get thru to their destination, and no error message created. > Invitations from lists, or responses to same, disappearing. > > Rich Martin > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > From - [email protected] > > Proof that liberty defending email is being censored > http://targetfreedom.typepad.com/targetfreedom/2009/03/liberty-defend... > > Censorship PART ONE > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vbF5PMsVmO0 > > Censorship PART TWO > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NBhU6d0HCJI > > Censorship Part 3: Replying to censored political messages > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rwy8rMUJl6g > > Censorship Part 4: Replying to censored political messages > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4O2PX0bhnwQ > > Replying to censored political messages that went to spam folder. > Censorship is being disguised as "spam filtering". Earlier we wrote: > "EVEN A REPLY TO THE CENSORED MESSAGE, FROM THE MAIN YAHOO SERVER, WILL > TRIGGER THE CAPCHA CENSORSHIP WINDOW." > > One of the censors got upset by this, and emailed me this comment: > "Have you seen one of these? ever? If you have seen one, please send me a > screenshot, if you personally have never seen it, please stop saying so." > > WELL HERE IT IS. I do not need to send this reply directly to him, since he > is reading all of my mail anyway. This is what happens every time, except > when you cannot even find the message in the spam folder. Usually it just > disappears. This is called being "black holed". > > Olbermann-FISA, Telecom Immunity and other Crimes > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PaKYadABc14 > Update: FISA warrantless wiretapping Bill (HR 6304) > Watch Mark Klein's testimony about this warrantless wiretapping. > Call your Senators through the switchboard at 202-224-3121 > or dial direct > Why is the government unwilling to let these facts be aired in open court? > Ben Siegrist, who works for Senator DeMint, told me that Mark Klein's > testimony is of no concern. See if you think that this is just a > "disgruntled employee". > The Senate could cast its final vote on warrantless wiretapping as soon as > today. We need to flood Congress with letters and calls demanding a no vote > on the FISA bill. There are relevant amendments to the FISA warrantless > wiretapping Bill. Ask your Senator to stand for liberty and the law, and vote > in favor of the Dodd-Feingold-Leahy Amendment. Dodd-Feingold-Leahy Amendment > stops retroactive immunity for telecommunications companies. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Statement on HR 6304, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) > Amendments > 20 June 2008 > Rep. Ron Paul, M.D. > > Madam Speaker, I regret that due to the unexpected last-minute appearance > of this measure on the legislative calendar this week, a prior commitment has > prevented me from voting on the FISA amendments. I have strongly opposed > every previous FISA overhaul attempt and I certainly would have voted against > this one as well. > The main reason I oppose this latest version is that it still clearly > violates the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution by allowing the federal > government to engage in the bulk collection of American citizens’ > communications without a search warrant. That US citizens can have their > private communication intercepted by the government without a search warrant > is anti-American, deeply disturbing, and completely unacceptable. > In addition to gutting the fourth amendment, this measure will deprive > Americans who have had their rights violated by telecommunication companies > involved in the Administration’s illegal wiretapping program the right to > seek redress in the courts for the wrongs committed against them. Worse, this > measure provides for retroactive immunity, whereby individuals or > organizations that broke the law as it existed are granted immunity for prior > illegal actions once the law has been changed. Ex post facto laws have long > been considered anathema in free societies under rule of law. Our Founding > Fathers recognized this, including in Article I section 9 of the Constitution > that “No bill of attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed.” How is this > FISA bill not a variation of ex post facto? That alone should give pause to > supporters of this measure. > Mr. Speaker, we should understand that decimating the protections that our > Constitution provides us against the government is far more dangerous to the > future of this country than whatever external threats may exist. We can > protect this country without violating the Constitution and I urge my > colleagues to reconsider their support for this measure. > > Senate Schedules FISA Debate for Next Week > Written by JBS Staff > Thursday, 03 July 2008 11:09 > > The Senate is presently on its Independence Day recess but will take up > debate on an overhaul of electronic surveillance rules next week. The bill > under consideration would rewrite the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act > (FISA). > > Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid. > Majority Leader Harry Reid said that the Senate would take up the > House-passed bill (H.R. 6304) on July 8. He and other leaders agreed to a > plan for consideration of the bill that is expected to lead to the Senate > passing the legislation for President Bush’s signature. > Reid had hoped to finish the bill last week, but the Senate agenda was > crowded and some Democrats who oppose the legislation refused to go along > with efforts to speed its consideration. > > Majority Whip Richard J. Durbin cited the opposition of Russ Feingold as > the major factor in the delay. Feingold argues the bill would jeopardize the > privacy of U.S. citizens and shield the Bush administration’s warrantless > surveillance program from any investigation. > The bill would rewrite FISA to allow warrantless surveillance of foreign > targets who may be communicating with people in the United States, although > with some court supervision of surveillance procedures. It is the result of a > bipartisan deal by House and Senate leaders reached this month; the House > passed it on June 20 by a vote of 239-129. > > The issue drawing the most opposition is a provision that effectively would > grant retroactive legal immunity to telecommunications companies being sued > for assisting the warrantless surveillance program. The Senate will vote next > week on an amendment that would strip the bill of its immunity provision. The > amendment would need only a majority vote for adoption, although a vote on a > similar amendment during consideration in February of another FISA bill (S. > 2248) received only 31 votes. On top of that, the bipartisan deal has gained > the support of Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama. > > It is ironic that, at a time when we are celebrating our precious freedoms > and rights, our representatives in Washington want to eviscerate our > treasured right to privacy in our own homes and let lawbreaking > telecommunications companies off the hook for handing over private > information without a warrant. > > Contact your senators and tell them what the 4th of July means to you and > ask them to defend your freedom by opposing the unconstitutional FISA bill. > Mark Klein's testimony > http://abcnews.go.com/Video/playerIndex?id=2930944 > > Why is the government unwilling to let these facts be aired in open court? > http://blog.wired.com:80/27bstroke6/2008/06/att-whistleblow.html > > AT&T Whistleblower: Spy Bill Creates 'Infrastructure for a Police State' > By Ryan Singel June 27, 2008 | 1:14:59 PMCategories: NSA > Mark Klein, the retired AT&T engineer who stepped forward with the > technical documents at the heart of the anti-wiretapping case against AT&T, > is furious at the Senate's vote on Wednesday night to hold a vote on a bill > intended to put an end to that lawsuit and more than 30 others. > > [Wednesday]'s vote by Congress effectively gives retroactive immunity to > the telecom companies and endorses an all-powerful president. It’s a > Congressional coup against the Constitution. > > The Democratic leadership is touting the deal as a "compromise," but in > fact they have endorsed the infamous Nuremberg defense: "Just following > orders." The judge can only check their paperwork. This cynical deal is a > Democratic exercise in deceit and cowardice. > > Klein saw a network monitoring room being built in AT&T's internet > switching center that only NSA-approved techs had access to. He squirreled > away documents and then presented them to the press and the Electronic > Frontier Foundation after news of the government's warrantless wiretapping > program broke. > > Wired.com independently acquired a copy of the documents (.pdf) -- which > were under court seal -- and published the wiring documents in May 2006 so > that they could be evaluated. > > The lawsuit that resulted from his documents is now waiting on the 9th U.S. > Appeals Court to rule on whether it can proceed despite the government saying > the whole matter is a state secret. A lower court judge ruled that it could, > because the government admitted the program existed and that the courts could > handle evidence safely and in secret. > But the appeals court ruling will likely never see the light of day, since > the Senate is set to vote on July 8 on the FISA Amendments Act of 2008, which > also largely legalizes > > ... > > read more »- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "APFN" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/APFN?hl=en APFN-1 YahooGroups: Subscribe: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/apfn-1/join Unsubscribe: [email protected] APFN MSG BOARD: `In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.' http://disc.server.com/Indices/234999.html APFN CONTENTS PAGE: http://www.apfn.org/old/apfncont.htm "RADIO YOUR WAY" APFN POGO NETWORK (( WOW!! )) "All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent" -- Thomas Jefferson http://www.apfn.net/POGO.HTM Find elected officials, including the president, members of Congress, governors, state legislators, local officials, and more. http://congress.org/congressorg/dbq/officials/ APFN, PMB 206, 7549 W. CACTUS RD. #104, PEORIA, AZ 85381 -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
