*Chuck Muth's
NEWS & VIEWS
*


**

**

**

*NEW ICE CREAM*

This was forwarded to me by a New & Views reader.  Not sure who the original
author is, but boy did he or she nail this one…

*“Baskin-Robbins Ice Cream has introduced a new flavor in honor of the 44th
President of the United States: Barocky Road.*

**

*“Barocky Road is a blend of half vanilla, half chocolate, and surrounded by
nuts and flakes.  The vanilla portion of the mix is not openly advertised
and usually denied as an ingredient.  The nuts and flakes are all very
bitter and hard to swallow.  The cost is $100 per scoop.*

**

*“When purchased it will be presented to you in a large beautiful cone, but
then the ice cream is taken away and given to the person in line behind you.
Thus you are left with an empty wallet, no change, holding an empty cone,
with no hope of getting any ice cream.”*

*CARTER II: THE REVENGE*

“I cannot believe what I heard today.  President Obama is disarming
America.  Never before has a president so ravaged the military at a time of
war.”

*- Sen. James Inhofe (R-Okla.) on Defense Secretary Gates’ defense cuts
which were announced on Monday*

**

*NOT ENOUGH RAPTORS*

“Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates delivered a benchmark speech today and
unveiled sweeping changes in both the weapons systems being pursued and the
budgetary process. . . . Debates on the budget by the Congress and Secretary
of Defense will be a long gone exigency in issues of life and death.



“And considering air power, we have already weighed in on the F-22.  It is
far superior to the F-35 and is simply needed in order to ensure air
superiority into the future.  Expensive, sure.  But Gates is stopping at 187
F-22s, plus about four more.  We probably need more.”



- *Herschel Smith, The Captain’s Journal, 4/6/09*

**

*GUTTING DEFENSE*

“In the 1990s, defense cuts helped pay for increased domestic spending, and
that is true today. . . . The termination of the F-22 Raptor program at just
187 aircraft inevitably will call U.S. air supremacy -- the salient feature,
since World War II, of the American way of war -- into question.



“The need for these sophisticated, stealthy, radar-evading planes is already
apparent. During Russia's invasion of Georgia, U.S. commanders wanted to fly
unmanned surveillance aircraft over the region, and requested that F-22s
sanitize the skies so that the slow-moving drones would be protected from
Russian fighters or air defenses. When the F-22s were not made available,
likely for fear of provoking Moscow, the reconnaissance flights were
canceled.



“As the air-defense and air-combat capabilities of other nations, most
notably China, increase, the demand for F-22s would likewise rise. And the
Air Force will have to manage this small fleet of Raptors over 30 years.
Compare that number with the 660 F-15s flying today, but which are literally
falling apart at the seams from age and use. The F-22 is not merely a
replacement for the F-15; it also performs the functions of electronic
warfare and other support aircraft.”

*- Thomas Donnelly and Gary Schmitt of the American Enterprise Institute,
Wall Street Journal, 4/8/09*

**

*THE NUCLEAR BOOGEY MAN*

“Nuclear weapons, while terrifying in the abstract, are not an immediate
strategic threat to Europe or the United States -- even from Iran.
Biological weapons are potentially more lethal. Chemical weapons are far
cheaper to produce. Within the United States, ordinary bombs and rogue
airplanes have already caused plenty of damage.”

- *Washington Post columnist Anne Applebaum*

**

*ILLEGAL SHOE NOW ON LEFT’S FOOT*

“For years, Democrats were happy to sit back and watch Republicans tear
their party apart over the issue of immigration, as happened with President
George W. Bush's failed guest-worker proposals in 2006.  But now it's
Democrats who are getting burned.

“Colorado was the scene Monday of a roiling debate over immigration when the
Democratically controlled state Senate unexpectedly rejected a measure to
allow illegal immigrants to pay in-state tuition at public universities. The
bill's sponsor, State Sen. Chris Romer, extracted a promise from Democratic
Gov. Bill Ritter to sign the legislation. He was certain he had the votes to
pass it. But at the last minute five Democrats defected and voted with
Republicans to defeat the bill.”

- *Brendan Miniter of Political Diary, 4/7/09*

**

*EQUAL PROTECTION UNDER THE LAW*

“We are firmly convinced the exclusion of gay and lesbian people from the
institution of civil marriage does not substantially further any important
governmental objective. The legislature has excluded a historically
disfavored class of persons from a supremely important civil institution
without a constitutionally sufficient justification."

- *Iowa Supreme Court in a ruling last week*

**

*GAY MARRIAGE HERE TO STAY*

“Vermont became the fourth state to legalize same-sex marriage, following
Massachusetts, Connecticut and Iowa,” reported the Wall Street Journal
yesterday. “The state legislature voted Tuesday to override Gov. Jim
Douglas's veto of a bill allowing gays and lesbians to marry.”



I know many of you don’t want to hear this, but you’re not going to put this
genie back in the bottle.  More and more courts will come to the same
conclusion as the Iowa Supreme Court did last week; that same-sex marriage
bans violate the constitutional rights of gay couples.  Legalized gay
marriages will continue to spread state by state.

And younger voters don’t care about this issue anywhere near as much as
older voters. That which doesn’t affect them doesn’t concern them.  They
don’t care if two gay guys across the street get “married” as long as it
doesn’t affect their own marriage.  And it doesn’t. So this is also a
generational change which opponents can only slow down, not reverse.



While many folks will continue very vocal opposition on this issue, it’s
only a matter of time before gay marriages are as accepted and common-place
as mixed-race marriages.  For those of you who will continue to oppose
allowing gays into the institution of marriage, remember this was all
brought on by first allowing the government into the institution of
marriage.  Once government began bestowing public benefits to married
couples, particularly through the tax code, this development became
inevitable on equal protection grounds.



Keep this precedent in mind as we continue allowing the Obama government to
take over American businesses.  Nothing good can possibly come from this.

**   **
*HOW TO SUBSCRIBE*

If you know someone who would like to receive Chuck’s *FREE* “News & Views”
e-briefing delivered directly to their email box, just sign up by *clicking
HERE* <http://www.citizenoutreach.com/>

 *Read more at www.MuthsTruths.com <http://www.muthstruths.com/>*





**
*Send replies & comments to this list and
**[email protected]*<[email protected]>

*Have you decided on which T-Party you're going to?*
**Tell us how it went and we'll pass it on.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

You are welcome to join the [email protected]

* Rich Martin *
**
*.*

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"APFN" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]

For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/APFN?hl=en

 APFN-1 YahooGroups:
Subscribe:  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/apfn-1/join
Unsubscribe:  [email protected]

APFN MSG BOARD:
`In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.'
http://disc.server.com/Indices/234999.html

APFN CONTENTS PAGE:
http://www.apfn.org/old/apfncont.htm

"RADIO YOUR WAY" APFN POGO NETWORK ((  WOW!!  ))
"All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of
good conscience to remain silent"  -- Thomas Jefferson
http://www.apfn.net/POGO.HTM

Find elected officials, including the president, members of
Congress, governors, state legislators, local officials, and more.
http://congress.org/congressorg/dbq/officials/

APFN,
PMB 206, 7549 W. CACTUS RD. #104, PEORIA, AZ 85381
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to