Great! I'm glad that solved it for you. Geography lookups like that can be tricky. We have a complex system to guess locations based on their names, which means that you can make pretty significant errors and still end up with the answer you intended. Refinements to the geographic data sometimes push a mistake out of the "guessed correctly" pile, but the corrected name will definitely work from now on.
Cheers, ~chris On Jan 17, 2011, at 12:11 PM, Nancy Tubbs wrote: > That did it, thanks very much Chris! Sorry to be a flake. > > But oddly, that was hard-coded, and I must have submitted hundreds of venues > like that. In case that's helpful. > > Thanks again, > Nancy > > >
