Hi Tim,
thans for your advice. My code checkes the returend limit and offset,
and uses them to calculate next offset and limit. Besides that, what I exepct
it that
endOfRecords shoud be true if returned fragment is the end of recoeds.
org.gbif.api.model.common.paging.PagingResponse#isEndOfRecords() contains
if (count != null) {
return count < offset + limit;
} else if (results != null) {
return results.size() < limit;
}
I suspect it should be
if (count != null) {
return count <= offset + limit;
} else if (results != null) {
return results.size() <= limit;
}
It doesn't explain, however, the result of
http://api.gbif.org/v1/species/search?q=Puma&rank=GENUS&limit=60&offset=0
which satisfies count < offset + limit.
I guess org.gbif.api.model.common.paging.PagingResponse.endOfRecord is set to be
Boolean.FALSE so it returns false endOfRecord.
Regards,
James
=============================
From: Tim Robertson <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [API-users] Usage of endOfRecords
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 10:49:13 +0100
> The APIs will respect the limit you pass in (e.g. 20 or 50 etc) but sometimes
> will impose a hard ceiling on the limit (e.g. you may request 10000 but only
> get 1000 or less back in some APIs).
> Therefore you should always check the count returned in the response in order
> to know how to calculate your next offset.
