Tim, Thanks, I should have thought of that!
Cheers, Scott On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Tim Robertson <trobertson at gbif.org> wrote: > Hi Scott > > Occurrence record fields are elastic - we support the full DwC, but can > only render from GBIF.org what is shared by the data publisher. > > So that field will only appear on records where it is present - here is an > example of a single record: > http://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/675943831 > > That record above is the interpreted view of the verbatim content we > observed from the source: > http://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/675943831/verbatim > > It is also returned in a search (same dataset as record above): > > http://api.gbif.org/v1/occurrence/search?datasetKey=b6015b60-6f96-43a9-88e5-2f41854e8f07 > > I hope this helps, > Tim > > > > > On 07 Oct 2014, at 20:48, Scott Chamberlain <scott at ropensci.org> wrote: > > Hmmm...I don't see establishmentMeans anywhere in the returned data from > the /occurrence . I do see documentation on it, endpoint > https://code.google.com/p/darwincore/wiki/Occurrence#establishmentMeans, > but is it included in data output anywhere? Maybe called something else? > > S > > On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 10:42 AM, Scott Chamberlain <scott at ropensci.org> > wrote: > >> Alex, >> >> Thanks, that's a good idea. I was thinking that there are a finite number >> of botanical gardens, so I could simply collect coordinates for each of >> them, and a reasonable bounding box around each one perhaps. >> >> Scott >> >> On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 10:03 AM, Alex Thompson <godfoder at acis.ufl.edu> >> wrote: >> >>> Also not something that can be done via the API, but botanical gardens >>> will also tend to be fairly large locality outliers (large numbers of >>> extremely tightly clustered points from relatively diverse taxa). Often, >>> I've found, many gardens are all geo-referenced to a single reference >>> locality, so you don't even need to do a bounding box filter, you can >>> just filter out specific points. >>> >>> - Alex >>> >>> On 10/07/2014 10:47 AM, Tim Robertson wrote: >>> > Hi Scott, >>> > >>> > There is actually no easy way of doing this. Filtering out >>> BasisOfRecord=LivingSpecimen would get you some of the way there, and >>> looking into the establishmentMeans a step further, but the some of the >>> data just don?t have fields to filter them out. >>> > >>> > Cheers, >>> > Tim >>> > >>> > >>> > On 07 Oct 2014, at 03:00, Scott Chamberlain <myrmecocystus at gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> >> Hello, >>> >> >>> >> Someone brought up recently whether or not they could exclude >>> observations from botanical gardens in GBIF occurrence searches. I think >>> they meant just occurrences from within actual gardens, not observations >>> from more natural areas in a database provided by a botanical garden. >>> >> >>> >> Is something like this already flagged as an issue in the occurrence >>> issue enum? I didn't see it myself. I guess one could find the data >>> providers that are botanical gardens and exclude those if they are in the >>> search results. >>> >> >>> >> Thanks for any guidance. >>> >> >>> >> Cheers, Scott Chamberlain >>> >> _______________________________________________ >>> >> API-users mailing list >>> >> API-users at lists.gbif.org >>> >> http://lists.gbif.org/mailman/listinfo/api-users >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > API-users mailing list >>> > API-users at lists.gbif.org >>> > http://lists.gbif.org/mailman/listinfo/api-users >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> API-users mailing list >>> API-users at lists.gbif.org >>> http://lists.gbif.org/mailman/listinfo/api-users >>> >> >> > _______________________________________________ > API-users mailing list > API-users at lists.gbif.org > http://lists.gbif.org/mailman/listinfo/api-users > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.gbif.org/pipermail/api-users/attachments/20141007/a7bb3802/attachment-0001.html
