On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Ludovic Poitou <[email protected]> wrote: > Sorry for the delayed answer. > Matt wasn't subscribed to the list (I think it's done now), and I'm out of > the office for a conference. > We will be back in the office on Monday and will give some answer (unless > Matt beats me with it). > Overall I do think we should try to match the names (and case) used in the > RFC.
Sure, as much as possible. This is why we picked LdapDn instead of DN, and such names. I just have an issue with Attribute, because if we want to write a wrapper around JNDI, it will end with ugly package bnames to be added in the code to avoid confusion between Attribute (jndi) and Attribute (API)... PS : Does Matt received my mail ? Or should I resubmit it to the list ? -- Regards, Cordialement, Emmanuel Lécharny www.iktek.com
