Hi everyone!
I have noticed a strage behavior/bug using the client API when I try to
create entries with encrypted password using {SHA}.
I am invoking the method the following constructor:
What is happening is: For some reason the API is adding a "'" for a few
entries. To make sure the problem is not with my code I have tried to use a
hardcoded value.
When I go to the Apache Directory Studio the password is like this:
'{sha}W6ph5Mm5Pz8GgiULbPgzG37mj9g=' and instead of being {sha} encrypted it
becomes plain text password.
The code below is inside a loop where I add different entries..
Entry entry = new DefaultEntry(dn, finalArray); //dn is a String and
finalArray is Object[]
private void addEntry(Entry entry, LdapConnection conn) throws
LdapException {
AddRequest addRequest = new AddRequestImpl();
addRequest.setEntry(entry);
AddResponse response = conn.add(addRequest);
if
(ResultCodeEnum.SUCCESS.equals(response.getLdapResult().getResultCode())) {
logger.log(Level.INFO, "Entry {0} added successfully",
entry.getDn().getName());
} else {
logger.log(Level.SEVERE, "Error adding entry {0} {1}", new
Object[]{entry.getDn().getName(), response.getLdapResult().getResultCode()
+ "-" + response.getLdapResult().getResultCode().getMessage()});
if (!
response.getLdapResult().getResultCode().equals(ResultCodeEnum.ENTRY_ALREADY_EXISTS)
) {
ldapExceptionManagerLocal.insert(this.createLdapSyncException(entry.getDn().getName(),
response.getLdapResult().getResultCode().name(),
response.getLdapResult().getResultCode().getMessage(),
LdapSyncException.ESYNC_TYPE.WALLET));
throw new
LdapException(response.getLdapResult().getResultCode().name());
}
}
}
That is result of the toString method.
Entry:
dn: uid=30,ou=customer_db,,dc=example,dc=com
objectclass: inetOrgPerson
objectclass: organizationalPerson
objectclass: person
objectclass: top
stateorprovincename: NY
postalcode: 10475
mail: [email protected]
sn: Doe
userpassword: {sha}W6ph5Mm5Pz8GgiULbPgzG37mj9g=
cn: John
street: 999 N TEST AVE
givenname: John
localityname: UNITED STATES
Does anybody know if there is a bug already registered for this?
Thanks
Flavio
