Hi Aftab, Since Andy have already sent a statement expressing my concern very well, let me refer a couple of lines from his statement as answers for your questions. (Thank you > Andy)
On 14/03/15 20:00, "Andy Linton" <[email protected]> wrote: > Our community's decision making process is supposed to be bottom up and > consensus driven. This model looks much more like top down and "we'll decide > what's best and let you know". This is a gap which I'm pointing out. > > And other critical tasks that APNIC should be driving like IPv6 adoption > languish. Perhaps the many hundreds of thousands of dollars APNIC spends on IG > should be focussed on engaging with major industries at the CEO level > explaining the business risks of not having a future proof addressing > strategy. We may do that - I'd like to see the reports. It is another example which APNIC needs to tackle as daily task. And, can I ask your additional thought about your comment? On 14/03/14 23:14, "Aftab Siddiqui" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Masato, > Glad to see that you have started this thread to engage more people to have > their opinion heard. > >> 1. In current approach, it is NOT clear that Internet Governance has >> relevance to our daily businesses and operations in the Internet. >> As a result, current approach is making a gap inside APRICOT and/or >> APNIC community though its intension is involving more >> participants to Internet Governance activity. > > I partially agree with your above comment regarding the relevance of IG with > daily businesses and operations. With my little experience I do understand > your view point because the country you are based in Internet is governed > through certain rules rules, norms and standards developed through > consultation and well drafted framework. But in our part of the region, the > picture is quite different, I hope you understand that difference. We are > going through consultation phase to define those rules and standards to govern > the internet. I basically agree that the situation is different in each country. However, do you think current APNIC's IG activity is reflecting your situation enough? Rgs, Masato Yamanishi On 14/03/14 23:14, "Aftab Siddiqui" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Masato, > Glad to see that you have started this thread to engage more people to have > their opinion heard. > >> 1. In current approach, it is NOT clear that Internet Governance has >> relevance to our daily businesses and operations in the Internet. >> As a result, current approach is making a gap inside APRICOT and/or >> APNIC community though its intension is involving more >> participants to Internet Governance activity. > > I partially agree with your above comment regarding the relevance of IG with > daily businesses and operations. With my little experience I do understand > your view point because the country you are based in Internet is governed > through certain rules rules, norms and standards developed through > consultation and well drafted framework. But in our part of the region, the > picture is quite different, I hope you understand that difference. We are > going through consultation phase to define those rules and standards to govern > the internet. I'm not sure how to define the gap in community because of IG > activities. Please help me and others to understand that how it is creating a > gap. > >> >> 2. While there is a question for its efficiency, APNIC is spending too much >> budget and human resources for Internet Governance >> activity and it is causing negative impact for APNIC daily operations as >> RIR. > > Yes, I'm also interested to know that how much budget and human resources > have been spent on IG related activities and its outcome. Not in terms of $ > but in terms of value. I beg to disagree that it is causing any negative > impact on APNIC's daily operation as RIR. I'm a very constant troublemaker for > APNIC helpdesk and Secretariat and I've never witnessed any delay or > inappropriate response from APNIC staff. So I'm not sure what made you say > that. Would you like to share any incident or issue which was not properly > addressed? > > > Regards, > > Aftab A. Siddiqui
_______________________________________________ apnic-talk mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/apnic-talk
