Thanks for the quick update George and the APNIC team.

grep "202.141.224.0" delegated-apnic-extended-latest
apnic|PK|ipv4|202.141.224.0|8192|20020419|allocated|A91733A8


Seems updated!


On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 7:00 PM George Kuo <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Anurag,
>
> Many thanks for pointing out the inconsistency. The "IN" in the ftp file
> is an error and it is being corrected. We will soon run a consistency
> check and investigate the cause of the error.
>
> I can confirm that 202.141.224.0/19 is allocated to PK as indicated by
> the Whois record.
>
> Once again, thank you for your question. My sincere apologies for the
> confusion caused.
>
>
> George Kuo
> APNIC
>
> On 31/5/18 6:18 pm, Anurag Bhatia wrote:
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> >
> > I am trying to understand a case scenario where a Pakistan based ISP
> > (Multinet Pakistan Pvt. Ltd.) AS9260 is being allocated and
> > originating certain addresses which are officially delegated to Indian
> > operator (though whois record reflects Pakistan).
> >
> >
> > Example pool which shows this behaviour:
> >
> > 202.141.224.0/19 <http://202.141.224.0/19> (visible in routing table,
> > originated by AS9260)
> > Here, whois query to APNIC DB reflects:
> >
> > % [whois.apnic.net <http://whois.apnic.net>]
> > % Whois data copyright terms    http://www.apnic.net/db/dbcopyright.html
> >
> > % Information related to '202.141.224.0 - 202.141.255.255'
> >
> > % Abuse contact for '202.141.224.0 - 202.141.255.255' is
> > '[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>'
> >
> > inetnum:        202.141.224.0 - 202.141.255.255
> > netname:        MULTINETPAKISTAN
> > descr:          Multinet Pakistan Pvt. Ltd.
> > country:        PK
> > org:            ORG-MB4-AP
> > admin-c:        AAA3-AP
> > tech-c:         IC219-AP
> > mnt-by:         APNIC-HM
> > mnt-routes:     MAINT-PK-MULTINETPAKISTAN
> > mnt-lower:      MAINT-PK-MULTINETPAKISTAN
> > mnt-irt:        IRT-MULTINETBROADBAND-PK
> > status:         ALLOCATED PORTABLE
> > last-modified:  2017-11-13T13:01:16Z
> > source:         APNIC
> >
> >
> >
> > Seems like a regular allocation to this network. But if we look at the
> > APNIC's delegation data
> > (https://ftp.apnic.net/stats/apnic/delegated-apnic-extended-latest), it
> > shows:
> >
> > grep "202.141.224.0" delegated-apnic-extended-latest
> > apnic|IN|ipv4|202.141.224.0|8192|20020419|allocated|A91733A8
> >
> >
> >
> > Here the allocated country is India. Is this is a case of IP address
> > transfer? Or a case where APNIC might have allocated it to an Indian
> > network back in 2002 and later pool was returned and allocated to this
> > network in Pakistan? Many tools which try to map prefixes to the country
> > based on the RIR data will map/assume this prefix to be belonging to
> > India which certainly not seem to be the case here.
> >
> > Anyone with insight on this?
> >
> > --
> >
> >
> > Anurag Bhatia
> > anuragbhatia.com <http://anuragbhatia.com>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > apnic-talk mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/apnic-talk
> >
>


-- 


Anurag Bhatia
anuragbhatia.com
_______________________________________________
apnic-talk mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/apnic-talk

Reply via email to