Your post is completely misleading, Paul.
You’re sugarcoating the matter and presenting as if AFRINIC is the damsel in distress that needs saving from the “unfair” members or its myriad of issues that it got into (thanks to the suspended CEO for that). The facts of the case remain: AFRINIC, under the influence of its now-suspended CEO, has done several infractions towards its members and its key role as an internet registry. Nothing more, and nothing less. What discredits you is the fact that you still choose to sugarcoat AFRINIC as it was even though the Mauritian courts have already ruled on the matter. What you want or is supporting is not a bottom-up, community driven sentiment. It’s a singular, top-down approach – one at odds with the community itself.
_______________________________________________ apnic-talk - https://mailman.apnic.net/[email protected]/ To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
