Hi Dilip, For such a keen eye try spelling my name correctly.
I won’t talk on behalf of The Register or Christopher, but as far as I’m concerned The Register is an independent reporting outlet. Have I spoken to the The Register before? Of course I have. However that doesn’t mean there’s some lobby strategy going on. (which I hope you can find the immense irony and huberous in your accusation) I have only ever provided The Register with facts based on the research and years of history I have in this field, I have only provided opinions when asked and I stand by them based on the facts. Having spoken far and wide to the general community (globally) it seems nearly all I speak to are rather aligned and of the same view as me. That view being that the NRS is a shady organisation, who has served no benefit to the community and trumpets transparency whilst not providing any of their own. A group who refuses time and time again to even provide a scant of evidence to whom it’s members are, and a shred of evidence to their legimancy, and to date I have not seen a single organisation come out in the NRS’s defence. If the objectives of this group are as you stated, I see no reason for at least a handful of organisations to come out publically and express their support for your agenda. It’s ironic because in Kyoto we saw such a staggering positive result in the bylaw changes, and so many I’ve spoken to said to the effect “We have to vote on these because groups like the NRS are bent on destroying us”. Where were the factions of your membership base speaking out? I only counted one publically. If the NRS was even remotely a legitiment organisation you’d have reached out to me and proven it, easily putting to bed any accusations I’ve made of the NRS and in turn I’d have issued a public statement to the validity of the organisation. I could take a very strong bet to say if I did release such statement, The Register would have surely reported on it, as I’d be eating some of my words. However, you have failed to ever reach out, have a meeting, or prove the legitimacy of your group and as such, myself, alongside many others have formed the aformentioned view. Kindest Regards, Karl Kloppenborg. From: Dilip Kounmany <[email protected]> Date: Tuesday, 20 February 2024 at 11:46 am To: Kams Yeung <[email protected]>, Simon Sharwood <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: [apnic-talk] Re: NRS endorses Kamz Yeung and Thomas Dragono Very interesting and Juicy. Dear Simon, I hope this email finds you in good health. I have been following recent posts where either Kal or Christopher expresses support for certain matters, and it appears that the three of you are consistently aligned and must be supported each other. It is a very interesting pattern. I am interested to know if there have been any specific lobbying strategies between The Register, Kal and Christopher ? The unity of perspectives between you, Kal, and Christopher is truly fascinating to observe. On a separate note, Mr. Kams, we are eagerly awaiting your response. Best regards, On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 2:07 PM Simon Sharwood <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi Okoli/Jason I'm a reporter who watches and writes about RIRs. I would value the chance to discuss your endorsements. I can be reached at https://www.theregister.com/Author/Email/Simon-Sharwood or of course in these forums. Simon _______________________________________________ APNIC-talk - https://mailman.apnic.net/[email protected]/ To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
_______________________________________________ APNIC-talk - https://mailman.apnic.net/[email protected]/ To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
